[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200820231140.GE7941@dread.disaster.area>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:11:40 +1000
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: hch@...radead.org, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, willy@...radead.org,
riteshh@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iomap: Fix the write_count in iomap_add_to_ioend().
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 03:58:41PM +0530, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
> From: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>
>
> __bio_try_merge_page() may return same_page = 1 and merged = 0.
> This could happen when bio->bi_iter.bi_size + len > UINT_MAX.
Ummm, silly question, but exactly how are we getting a bio that
large in ->writepages getting built? Even with 64kB pages, that's a
bio with 2^16 pages attached to it. We shouldn't be building single
bios in writeback that large - what storage hardware is allowing
such huge bios to be built? (i.e. can you dump all the values in
/sys/block/<dev>/queue/* for that device for us?)
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists