[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f9fbdb1.bc96.1740a9560d5.Coremail.dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:36:35 +0800 (GMT+08:00)
From: dinghao.liu@....edu.cn
To: "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: "Markus Elfring" <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz" <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
"Bryan Wu" <cooloney@...il.com>,
"Daniel Thompson" <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
"Gyungoh Yoo" <jack.yoo@...worksinc.com>,
"Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@...il.com>, "Kangjie Lu" <kjlu@....edu>
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [PATCH] video: backlight: sky81452-backlight: Fix
reference count imbalance on error
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020, dinghao.liu@....edu.cn wrote:
>
> > > On Wed, 19 Aug 2020, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > >
> > > > > When of_property_read_u32_array() returns an error code,
> > > > > a pairing refcount decrement is needed to keep np's refcount balanced.
> > > >
> > > > Can another imperative wording be helpful for the change description?
> > > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=18445bf405cb331117bc98427b1ba6f12418ad17#n151
> > > >
> > > > Would an other commit message be a bit nicer?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > …
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/sky81452-backlight.c
> > > > > @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ static struct sky81452_bl_platform_data *sky81452_bl_parse_dt(
> > > > > num_entry);
> > > > > if (ret < 0) {
> > > > > dev_err(dev, "led-sources node is invalid.\n");
> > > > > + of_node_put(np);
> > > > > return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > I propose to add the jump target “put_node” so that a bit of common exception
> > > > handling code can be better reused at the end of this function implementation.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Markus
> > >
> > > You can safely ignore any review comments from Markus!
> > >
> > > However, this patch doesn't appear to be in my inbox.
> > >
> > > Any ideas as to why?
> > >
> >
> > Thank you for your advice. My outbox shows that this patch
> > has reached your email server successfully. Maybe this
> > ended up in your junk mail file?
>
> This has happened recently, so I was sure to check.
>
> Not there either unfortunately.
>
> Would you be kind enough to bounce/resend please?
>
Sure.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists