linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] opp: Reused enabled flag and remove regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200820071915.eesd3hygheraqbyh@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:49:15 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>, mka@...omium.org,
        sibis@...eaurora.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] opp: Reused enabled flag and remove regulator_enabled

On 15-08-20, 00:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Viresh Kumar (2020-08-12 21:29:00)
> > diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
> > index e8882e7fd8a5..5f5da257f58a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/opp/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
> > @@ -703,12 +703,10 @@ static int _generic_set_opp_regulator(struct opp_table *opp_table,
> >          * Enable the regulator after setting its voltages, otherwise it breaks
> >          * some boot-enabled regulators.
> >          */
> > -       if (unlikely(!opp_table->regulator_enabled)) {
> > +       if (unlikely(!opp_table->enabled)) {
> >                 ret = regulator_enable(reg);
> >                 if (ret < 0)
> >                         dev_warn(dev, "Failed to enable regulator: %d", ret);
> > -               else
> > -                       opp_table->regulator_enabled = true;
> 
> A quick glance makes this look unsafe now because we're only checking
> 'enabled' and not actually setting it when this function is called. I
> have to go back to the previous patch to understand where enabled is now
> set to confirm that it is OK. If it was all one patch all the context
> would be here.

The only case where things can go crazy are the cases where (for
example) clk_set_rate() fails, or something like that which would be a
bug and it shouldn't bother in the normal working of this code.

-- 
viresh