linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.8 008/232] PCI/ATS: Add pci_pri_supported() to check device or associated PF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200820091613.107470908@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 11:17:39 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 008/232] PCI/ATS: Add pci_pri_supported() to check device or associated PF

From: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>

commit 3f9a7a13fe4cb6e119e4e4745fbf975d30bfac9b upstream.

For SR-IOV, the PF PRI is shared between the PF and any associated VFs, and
the PRI Capability is allowed for PFs but not for VFs.  Searching for the
PRI Capability on a VF always fails, even if its associated PF supports
PRI.

Add pci_pri_supported() to check whether device or its associated PF
supports PRI.

[bhelgaas: commit log, avoid "!!"]
Fixes: b16d0cb9e2fc ("iommu/vt-d: Always enable PASID/PRI PCI capabilities before ATS")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1595543849-19692-1-git-send-email-ashok.raj@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org	# v4.4+
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c |    2 +-
 drivers/pci/ats.c           |   15 +++++++++++++++
 include/linux/pci-ats.h     |    4 ++++
 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -2565,7 +2565,7 @@ static struct dmar_domain *dmar_insert_o
 			}
 
 			if (info->ats_supported && ecap_prs(iommu->ecap) &&
-			    pci_find_ext_capability(pdev, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PRI))
+			    pci_pri_supported(pdev))
 				info->pri_supported = 1;
 		}
 	}
--- a/drivers/pci/ats.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/ats.c
@@ -325,6 +325,21 @@ int pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(struct p
 
 	return pdev->pasid_required;
 }
+
+/**
+ * pci_pri_supported - Check if PRI is supported.
+ * @pdev: PCI device structure
+ *
+ * Returns true if PRI capability is present, false otherwise.
+ */
+bool pci_pri_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+	/* VFs share the PF PRI */
+	if (pci_physfn(pdev)->pri_cap)
+		return true;
+	return false;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_pri_supported);
 #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_PRI */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_PASID
--- a/include/linux/pci-ats.h
+++ b/include/linux/pci-ats.h
@@ -28,6 +28,10 @@ int pci_enable_pri(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 void pci_disable_pri(struct pci_dev *pdev);
 int pci_reset_pri(struct pci_dev *pdev);
 int pci_prg_resp_pasid_required(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+bool pci_pri_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+#else
+static inline bool pci_pri_supported(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{ return false; }
 #endif /* CONFIG_PCI_PRI */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PCI_PASID