lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53afbfba-427e-72f5-73a6-faea7606e78e@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:01:15 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" 
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] KVM: nSVM: read only changed fields of the nested
 guest data area

On 20/08/20 11:13, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> +	u32 clean = nested_vmcb->control.clean;
> +
> +	if (svm->nested.vmcb_gpa != vmcb_gpa) {
> +		svm->nested.vmcb_gpa = vmcb_gpa;
> +		clean = 0;
> +	}

You probably should set clean to 0 also if the guest doesn't have the
VMCBCLEAN feature (so, you first need an extra patch to add the
VMCBCLEAN feature to cpufeatures.h).  It's probably best to cache the
guest vmcbclean in struct vcpu_svm, too.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ