linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/2] timekeeping: NMI safe timekeeper enhancements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <878se9ip7k.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:30:55 +0200
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
        Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] timekeeping: NMI safe timekeeper enhancements

Petr,

On Thu, Aug 20 2020 at 10:47, Petr Mladek wrote:
> The interface is perfectly fine for printk() needs.

Good. So I suggest that I apply that on top of rc1 somewhere in tip and
tag the top commit. So you can pull that tag into your printk branch and
go wild.

Thanks,

        tglx