linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/152] 5.4.60-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+G9fYvGiOSBiCHpVGYXeXo3ZF3UDzj_Jy+_jqBD8CgwotS2hg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Aug 2020 22:03:10 +0530
From:   Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        linux- stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/152] 5.4.60-rc1 review

On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 22:54, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 20 Aug 2020 at 15:15, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.60 release.
> > There are 152 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:15:09 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.60-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> > Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> >     crypto: af_alg - Fix regression on empty requests
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions detected.
>
> LTP crypto af_alg02 and cve-2017-17805 failed on stable-rc 5.4, 5.7 and 5.8
> branches on arm, arm64, i386 and x86_64.

Apart from the reported LTP crypto test case problem all other results
look good to me.

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.4.60
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.4.y
git commit: 77fcb48939fc863d9ba9d808fac9000959e937d3
git describe: v5.4.60
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.4-oe/build/v5.4.60

No regressions (compared to build v5.4.59)

No fixes (compared to build v5.4.59)

Ran 28522 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- x15
- x86
- x86-kasan

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* igt-gpu-tools
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* libhugetlbfs
* linux-log-parser
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-controllers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-crypto-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* perf
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-tracing-tests
* network-basic-tests
* v4l2-compliance
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests

-- 
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org