[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <159803479017.29194.1359332295829225843@build.alporthouse.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 19:33:10 +0100
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: ashok.raj@...el.com, jacob.jun.pan@...el.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
jamessewart@...sta.com, tmurphy@...sta.com, dima@...sta.com,
sai.praneeth.prakhya@...el.com, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/15] iommu/vt-d: Delegate the dma domain to upper layer
Quoting Lu Baolu (2019-05-25 06:41:28)
> This allows the iommu generic layer to allocate a dma domain and
> attach it to a device through the iommu api's. With all types of
> domains being delegated to upper layer, we can remove an internal
> flag which was used to distinguish domains mananged internally or
> externally.
I'm seeing some really strange behaviour with this patch on a 32b
Skylake system (and still present on mainline). Before this patch
everything is peaceful and appears to work correctly. Applying this patch,
and we fail to initialise the GPU with a few DMAR errors reported, e.g.
[ 20.279445] DMAR: DRHD: handling fault status reg 3
[ 20.279508] DMAR: [DMA Read] Request device [00:02.0] fault addr 8900a000 [fault reason 05] PTE Write access is not set
Setting an identity map for the igfx made the DMAR errors disappear, but
the GPU still failed to initialise.
There's no difference in the DMAR configuration dmesg between working and
the upset patch. And the really strange part is that switching to a 64b
kernel with this patch, it's working.
Any suggestions on what I should look for?
-Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists