[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200821075819.152474-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:58:19 +0200
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: james.smart@...adcom.com, hch@....de, sagi@...mberg.me,
chaitanya.kulkarni@....com
Cc: linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] nvmet-fc: Fix a missed _irqsave version of spin_lock in 'nvmet_fc_fod_op_done()'
The way 'spin_lock()' and 'spin_lock_irqsave()' are used is not consistent
in this function.
Use 'spin_lock_irqsave()' also here, as there is no guarantee that
interruptions are disabled at that point, according to surrounding code.
Fixes: a97ec51b37ef ("nvmet_fc: Rework target side abort handling")
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
---
Not tested, only based on what looks logical to me according to
surrounding code
---
drivers/nvme/target/fc.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
index 55bafd56166a..e6861cc10e7d 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/fc.c
@@ -2342,9 +2342,9 @@ nvmet_fc_fod_op_done(struct nvmet_fc_fcp_iod *fod)
return;
if (fcpreq->fcp_error ||
fcpreq->transferred_length != fcpreq->transfer_length) {
- spin_lock(&fod->flock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&fod->flock, flags);
fod->abort = true;
- spin_unlock(&fod->flock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&fod->flock, flags);
nvmet_req_complete(&fod->req, NVME_SC_INTERNAL);
return;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists