[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ceb9aa5-2a6b-b788-8467-f9820d2c094f@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:48:40 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>,
Pankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta.linux@...il.com>,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] mm / virtio-mem: support ZONE_MOVABLE
On 21.08.20 10:46, Baoquan He wrote:
> On 08/21/20 at 10:31am, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>> On 16.08.20 14:53, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>>> For 5.10. Patch #1-#4,#6 have RBs or ACKs, patch #5 is virtio-mem stuff
>>> maintained by me. This should go via the -mm tree.
>>>
>>
>> @Andrew, can we give this a churn if there are no further comments? Thanks!
>
> Saw this series in next already.
Hehe, yeah I also just stumbled over them while rebasing :)
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists