linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 11/11] lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200821085348.782688941@infradead.org>
Date:   Fri, 21 Aug 2020 10:47:49 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org, will@...nel.org
Cc:     npiggin@...il.com, elver@...gle.com, jgross@...e.com,
        paulmck@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, svens@...ux.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/11] lockdep,trace: Expose tracepoints

The lockdep tracepoints are under the lockdep recursion counter, this
has a bunch of nasty side effects:

 - TRACE_IRQFLAGS doesn't work across the entire tracepoint

 - RCU-lockdep doesn't see the tracepoints either, hiding numerous
   "suspicious RCU usage" warnings.

Pull the trace_lock_*() tracepoints completely out from under the
lockdep recursion handling and completely rely on the trace level
recusion handling -- also, tracing *SHOULD* not be taking locks in any
case.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Tested-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
---
 kernel/locking/lockdep.c |   14 +++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -5044,6 +5044,8 @@ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lo
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	trace_lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check, nest_lock, ip);
+
 	if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion)) {
 		/* XXX allow trylock from NMI ?!? */
 		if (lockdep_nmi() && !trylock) {
@@ -5068,7 +5070,6 @@ void lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lo
 	check_flags(flags);
 
 	current->lockdep_recursion++;
-	trace_lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check, nest_lock, ip);
 	__lock_acquire(lock, subclass, trylock, read, check,
 		       irqs_disabled_flags(flags), nest_lock, ip, 0, 0);
 	lockdep_recursion_finish();
@@ -5080,13 +5081,15 @@ void lock_release(struct lockdep_map *lo
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	trace_lock_release(lock, ip);
+
 	if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion))
 		return;
 
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
+
 	current->lockdep_recursion++;
-	trace_lock_release(lock, ip);
 	if (__lock_release(lock, ip))
 		check_chain_key(current);
 	lockdep_recursion_finish();
@@ -5272,8 +5275,6 @@ __lock_acquired(struct lockdep_map *lock
 		hlock->holdtime_stamp = now;
 	}
 
-	trace_lock_acquired(lock, ip);
-
 	stats = get_lock_stats(hlock_class(hlock));
 	if (waittime) {
 		if (hlock->read)
@@ -5292,6 +5293,8 @@ void lock_contended(struct lockdep_map *
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	trace_lock_contended(lock, ip);
+
 	if (unlikely(!lock_stat || !debug_locks))
 		return;
 
@@ -5301,7 +5304,6 @@ void lock_contended(struct lockdep_map *
 	raw_local_irq_save(flags);
 	check_flags(flags);
 	current->lockdep_recursion++;
-	trace_lock_contended(lock, ip);
 	__lock_contended(lock, ip);
 	lockdep_recursion_finish();
 	raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -5312,6 +5314,8 @@ void lock_acquired(struct lockdep_map *l
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	trace_lock_acquired(lock, ip);
+
 	if (unlikely(!lock_stat || !debug_locks))
 		return;