[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0137e0a8-e5c4-2ea0-12e7-2d5a19f827c1@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:33:09 +0800
From: Jacob Wen <jian.w.wen@...cle.com>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] writeback: use DEFINE_WAIT_BIT instead of DEFINE_WAIT
for bit wait queue
Can I have a review?
On 8/13/20 1:05 PM, Jacob Wen wrote:
> DEFINE_WAIT_BIT uses wake_bit_function() which is able to avoid
> false-wakeups due to possible hash collisions in the bit wait table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jacob Wen <jian.w.wen@...cle.com>
> ---
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index a605c3dddabc..3bf751b33b48 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -1354,16 +1354,16 @@ void inode_wait_for_writeback(struct inode *inode)
> static void inode_sleep_on_writeback(struct inode *inode)
> __releases(inode->i_lock)
> {
> - DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
> + DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wait, &inode->i_state, __I_SYNC);
> wait_queue_head_t *wqh = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_SYNC);
> int sleep;
>
> - prepare_to_wait(wqh, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> + prepare_to_wait(wqh, &wait.wq_entry, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
> sleep = inode->i_state & I_SYNC;
> spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> if (sleep)
> schedule();
> - finish_wait(wqh, &wait);
> + finish_wait(wqh, &wait.wq_entry);
> }
>
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists