[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200821111343.GC20455@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 12:13:44 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: qiang.zhang@...driver.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/percpu-rwsem: Remove WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE flags
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 01:57:20PM +0800, qiang.zhang@...driver.com wrote:
> From: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
>
> Remove WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE from "wq_entry.flags", using function
> __add_wait_queue_entry_tail_exclusive substitution.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...driver.com>
> ---
> kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
> index 8bbafe3e5203..48e1c55c2e59 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c
> @@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ static void percpu_rwsem_wait(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem, bool reader)
> */
> wait = !__percpu_rwsem_trylock(sem, reader);
> if (wait) {
> - wq_entry.flags |= WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE | reader * WQ_FLAG_CUSTOM;
> - __add_wait_queue_entry_tail(&sem->waiters, &wq_entry);
> + wq_entry.flags |= reader * WQ_FLAG_CUSTOM;
> + __add_wait_queue_entry_tail_exclusive(&sem->waiters, &wq_entry);
> }
> spin_unlock_irq(&sem->waiters.lock);
Seems straightforward enough:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists