[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200821124547.GY1152540@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 09:45:47 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
"Jacob Pan" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
<iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
"Jon Derrick" <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 38/38] irqchip: Add IMS array driver - NOT FOR MERGING
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 02:25:02AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> +static void ims_mask_irq(struct irq_data *data)
> +{
> + struct msi_desc *desc = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
> + struct ims_array_slot __iomem *slot = desc->device_msi.priv_iomem;
> + u32 __iomem *ctrl = &slot->ctrl;
> +
> + iowrite32(ioread32(ctrl) & ~IMS_VECTOR_CTRL_UNMASK, ctrl);
Just to be clear, this is exactly the sort of operation we can't do
with non-MSI interrupts. For a real PCI device to execute this it
would have to keep the data on die.
I saw the idxd driver was doing something like this, I assume it
avoids trouble because it is a fake PCI device integrated with the
CPU, not on a real PCI bus?
It is really nice to see irq_domain used properly in x86!
Thanks,
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists