linux-kernel - [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200821150134.2581465-18-guro@fb.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Aug 2020 08:01:21 -0700
From:   Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To:     <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, <kernel-team@...com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 17/30] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps

Do not use rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps.
It has been replaced with the memcg-based memory accounting.

Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
---
 kernel/bpf/local_storage.c | 21 +--------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
index 212d6dbbc39a..c28a47d5177a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/local_storage.c
@@ -288,8 +288,6 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 {
 	int numa_node = bpf_map_attr_numa_node(attr);
 	struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map *map;
-	struct bpf_map_memory mem;
-	int ret;
 
 	if (attr->key_size != sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_key) &&
 	    attr->key_size != sizeof(__u64))
@@ -309,18 +307,10 @@ static struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr)
 		/* max_entries is not used and enforced to be 0 */
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
-	ret = bpf_map_charge_init(&mem, sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map));
-	if (ret < 0)
-		return ERR_PTR(ret);
-
 	map = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage_map),
 			   __GFP_ZERO | GFP_USER | __GFP_ACCOUNT, numa_node);
-	if (!map) {
-		bpf_map_charge_finish(&mem);
+	if (!map)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	}
-
-	bpf_map_charge_move(&map->map.memory, &mem);
 
 	/* copy mandatory map attributes */
 	bpf_map_init_from_attr(&map->map, attr);
@@ -509,9 +499,6 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 
 	size = bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(map, &pages);
 
-	if (bpf_map_charge_memlock(map, pages))
-		return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
-
 	storage = kmalloc_node(sizeof(struct bpf_cgroup_storage), gfp,
 			       map->numa_node);
 	if (!storage)
@@ -533,7 +520,6 @@ struct bpf_cgroup_storage *bpf_cgroup_storage_alloc(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 	return storage;
 
 enomem:
-	bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(map, pages);
 	kfree(storage);
 	return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 }
@@ -560,16 +546,11 @@ void bpf_cgroup_storage_free(struct bpf_cgroup_storage *storage)
 {
 	enum bpf_cgroup_storage_type stype;
 	struct bpf_map *map;
-	u32 pages;
 
 	if (!storage)
 		return;
 
 	map = &storage->map->map;
-
-	bpf_cgroup_storage_calculate_size(map, &pages);
-	bpf_map_uncharge_memlock(map, pages);
-
 	stype = cgroup_storage_type(map);
 	if (stype == BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_SHARED)
 		call_rcu(&storage->rcu, free_shared_cgroup_storage_rcu);
-- 
2.26.2