[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3836b482434bd0b9a609959d3696cc6113a93f2f.camel@perches.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 22:30:21 -0700
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
kernel-janitors <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
kernelnewbies <kernelnewbies@...nelnewbies.org>,
linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
cocci <cocci@...teme.lip6.fr>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [Cocci] coccinelle: Convert comma to semicolons (was Re:
[PATCH] checkpatch: Add test for comma use that should be semicolon)
On Fri, 2020-08-21 at 23:35 -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 18:08:08 -0700, Joe Perches said:
> > (forwarding on to kernel-janitors/mentees and kernelnewbies)
> >
> > Just fyi for anyone that cares:
> >
> > A janitorial task for someone might be to use Julia's coccinelle
> > script below to convert the existing instances of commas that
> > separate statements into semicolons.
>
> Note that you need to *really* check for possible changes in semantics.
> It's *usually* OK to do that, but sometimes it's not...
>
> for (i=0; i++, last++; !last) {
>
> changing that comma to a ; will break the compile. In other cases, it can
> introduce subtle bugs.
True enough for a general statement, though the coccinelle
script Julia provided does not change a single instance of
for loop expressions with commas.
As far as I can tell, no logic defect is introduced by the
script at all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists