[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wgQ_bqiEXrwnAratT+2N+VGdhEsK7xShaj04Dgo2JNwtA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 09:05:37 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Maya B . Gokhale" <gokhale2@...l.gov>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Marty Mcfadden <mcfadden8@...l.gov>,
Kirill Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...tuozzo.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mm: Simplfy cow handling
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 4:50 PM Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> - Run a busy loop dirty program [1] that uses 6G of memory, restrict to 1G
> RAM + 5G swap (cgroup). A few hours later, all things still look good.
> Make sure to observe (still massive) correct page reuses using the new
> counter using the last patch, probably when swapping in.
>
> - Run umapsort [2] to make sure uffd-wp will work again after applying this
> series upon master 5.9-rc1 (5.9-rc1 is broken).
I obviously like the diffstat, am wondering if you saw any throughput
changes or similar for the busy-loop dirtying thing?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists