[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200822164334.GA2625@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 17:43:34 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...hat.com>, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
david@...morbit.com, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V3] iomap: add support to track dirty state of sub
pages
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 03:24:14PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> The case I was worrying about:
>
> fill a filesystem so that free space is very fragmented
> readahead into a hole
> hole is large, don't allocate an iop
> writeback the page
> don't have an iop, can't track the write count
>
> I'd be fine with choosing to allocate an iop later (and indeed I do that
> as part of the THP work). But does this scenario make you think of any
> other corner cases?
Can't think of a corner case. And as said last time this comes up I
think trying to allocate the iop as late and lazy as possible is
probably a good thing. I just went for the dumb way because it was
simpler and already a huge improvement over buffer heads.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists