linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Fix bogus thermal shutdowns for omap4430

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200823211204.zerldmljfd6rrk7g@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Sun, 23 Aug 2020 23:12:04 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
        Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, Merlijn Wajer <merlijn@...zup.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: Fix bogus thermal shutdowns for
 omap4430

Hi!

> We can sometimes get bogus thermal shutdowns on omap4430 at least with
> droid4 running idle with a battery charger connected:
> 
> thermal thermal_zone0: critical temperature reached (143 C), shutting down
> 
> Dumping out the register values shows we can occasionally get a 0x7f value
> that is outside the TRM listed values in the ADC conversion table. And then
> we get a normal value when reading again after that. Reading the register
> multiple times does not seem help avoiding the bogus values as they stay
> until the next sample is ready.
> 
> Looking at the TRM chapter "18.4.10.2.3 ADC Codes Versus Temperature", we
> should have values from 13 to 107 listed with a total of 95 values. But
> looking at the omap4430_adc_to_temp array, the values are off, and the
> end values are missing. And it seems that the 4430 ADC table is similar
> to omap3630 rather than omap4460.
> 
> Let's fix the issue by using values based on the omap3630 table and just
> ignoring invalid values. Compared to the 4430 TRM, the omap3630 table has
> the missing values added while the TRM table only shows every second
> value.
> 
> Note that sometimes the ADC register values within the valid table can
> also be way off for about 1 out of 10 values. But it seems that those
> just show about 25 C too low values rather than too high values. So those
> do not cause a bogus thermal shutdown.

This does not seem to be in recent -next. Ping?

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)