lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 23 Aug 2020 07:25:59 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-block@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] bio: introduce BIO_FOLL_PIN flag

On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:20:58PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> Add a new BIO_FOLL_PIN flag to struct bio, whose "short int" flags field
> was full, thuse triggering an expansion of the field from 16, to 32
> bits. This allows for a nice assertion in bio_release_pages(), that the
> bio page release mechanism matches the page acquisition mechanism.
> 
> Set BIO_FOLL_PIN whenever pin_user_pages_fast() is used, and check for
> BIO_FOLL_PIN before using unpin_user_page().

When would the flag not be set when BIO_NO_PAGE_REF is not set?

Also I don't think we can't just expand the flags field, but I can send
a series to kill off two flags.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ