linux-kernel - [PATCH] NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 23 Aug 2020 15:23:43 +0800
From:   Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
To:     dinghao.liu@....edu.cn, kjlu@....edu
Cc:     Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] NFC: st95hf: Fix memleak in st95hf_in_send_cmd

When down_killable() fails, skb_resp should be freed
just like when st95hf_spi_send() fails.

Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@....edu.cn>
---
 drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
index 9642971e89ce..457854765983 100644
--- a/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nfc/st95hf/core.c
@@ -966,7 +966,7 @@ static int st95hf_in_send_cmd(struct nfc_digital_dev *ddev,
 	rc = down_killable(&stcontext->exchange_lock);
 	if (rc) {
 		WARN(1, "Semaphore is not found up in st95hf_in_send_cmd\n");
-		return rc;
+		goto free_skb_resp;
 	}
 
 	rc = st95hf_spi_send(&stcontext->spicontext, skb->data,
-- 
2.17.1