[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200823090915.GA2764@lst.de>
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2020 11:09:15 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: 田 <xianting_tian@....com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Justin Sanders <justin@...aid.com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
"linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>,
Stefan Haberland <sth@...ux.ibm.com>,
Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@...ux.ibm.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"nbd@...er.debian.org" <nbd@...er.debian.org>,
"linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-s390@...r.kernel.org" <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: fix locking for struct block_device size
updates
On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 06:02:32PM +0800, 田 wrote:
> thanks Hellwig for your kindly reply and your fix and add report by me :)
I found an issue with the patch, and will send a new version in a bit.
If this works for your reproducer, can you add a Tested-by: tag?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists