linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] opp: Set required OPPs in reverse order when scaling down

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200824113027.lzh6fp4bottjl6cc@vireshk-i7>
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:00:27 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Niklas Cassel <nks@...wful.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] opp: Set required OPPs in reverse order when
 scaling down

On 21-08-20, 18:31, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> This patch does not apply anymore after the cleanup you pushed to
> opp/linux-next. I would be happy to send a v2 with that fixed.
> 
> On my other OPP patch set you mentioned that you might apply these
> directly with some of your own changes - would you also prefer to do it
> yourself in this case or should I send a v2?

I will pick the first 2 myself, that's fine. Lets see where we go with
the third one :)

> Still looking for your feedback on both patch sets by the way! :)

Sorry about the delay, I was on vacation for over a week in between and
this and the other patchset was a bit tricky (which you may have not
realized, not sure, as I wondered if something will not work within
the OPP core for v1 binding, but it did finally I believe) :)

-- 
viresh