[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200824114332.GN5493@kadam>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:43:32 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Tomer Samara <tomersamara98@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
Riley Andrews <riandrews@...roid.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@...gle.com>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>,
Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] staging: android: Remove BUG from
ion_system_heap.c
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:27:08PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 02:24:57PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:25:26AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 8/21/20 8:28 AM, Tomer Samara wrote:
> > > > Remove BUG() from ion_sytem_heap.c
> > > >
> > > > this fix the following checkpatch issue:
> > > > Avoid crashing the kernel - try using WARN_ON &
> > > > recovery code ratherthan BUG() or BUG_ON().
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tomer Samara <tomersamara98@...il.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c | 2 +-
> > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c
> > > > index eac0632ab4e8..00d6154aec34 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/staging/android/ion/ion_system_heap.c
> > > > @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ static int order_to_index(unsigned int order)
> > > > for (i = 0; i < NUM_ORDERS; i++)
> > > > if (order == orders[i])
> > > > return i;
> > > > - BUG();
> > > > + /* This is impossible. */
> > > > return -1;
> > > > }
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > Please explain why this is impossible.
> > >
> > > If some caller calls order_to_index(5), it will return -1, yes?
> > >
> >
> > I was happy enough with the comment as-is given that I suggested it.
> > But an alternative comment could be "/* This is impossible.
> > We always pass valid values to this function. */
>
> Another option is to just change the BUG_ON() to a WARN_ON(). I feel
> like that communicates the same thing but makes checkpatch happy.
Actually earlier Greg pointed out that some systems have panic on warn
so WARN_ON() doesn't work. Just add the comment.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists