[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200824065801.GH13023@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 08:58:01 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/22] dt-bindings: gpio: fsl-imx-gpio: Add gpio-ranges
property
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 08:38:06AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 07:24:46AM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 06:15:30PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > > The GPIO controller node can have gpio-ranges property. This fixes
> > > dtbs_check warnings like:
> > >
> > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-evk.dt.yaml: gpio@...00000: 'gpio-ranges' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> > > From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.yaml
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.yaml | 15 +++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.yaml
> > > index 454db20c2d1a..1fac69573bb9 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/fsl-imx-gpio.yaml
> > > @@ -51,6 +51,9 @@ properties:
> > >
> > > gpio-controller: true
> > >
> > > + gpio-ranges:
> > > + maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > required:
> > > - compatible
> > > - reg
> > > @@ -62,6 +65,18 @@ required:
> > >
> > > additionalProperties: false
> > >
> > > +allOf:
> > > + - if:
> > > + properties:
> > > + compatible:
> > > + contains:
> > > + const: fsl,imx8mp-gpio
> > > + then:
> > > + properties:
> > > + gpio-ranges:
> > > + minItems: 1
> > > + maxItems: 2
> >
> > Why do you limit this to fsl,imx8mp-gpio? The i.MX5,6,7 dtsi files use
> > gpio-ranges as well and other i.MX dtsi files could also use it.
>
> All other cases use maximum one element in gpio-ranges, so they are
> covered so I assumed they are continuous. But if it not the case, I can
> make all them maximum 2.
I misread this, I thought you allow gpio-ranges only for imx8mp, but
it's only the maxItems you set differently for that SoC. Anyway,
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6dl.dtsi has this:
&gpio1 {
gpio-ranges = <&iomuxc 0 131 2>, <&iomuxc 2 137 8>, <&iomuxc 10 189 2>,
<&iomuxc 12 194 1>, <&iomuxc 13 193 1>, <&iomuxc 14 192 1>,
<&iomuxc 15 191 1>, <&iomuxc 16 185 2>, <&iomuxc 18 184 1>,
<&iomuxc 19 187 1>, <&iomuxc 20 183 1>, <&iomuxc 21 188 1>,
<&iomuxc 22 123 3>, <&iomuxc 25 121 1>, <&iomuxc 26 127 1>,
<&iomuxc 27 126 1>, <&iomuxc 28 128 1>, <&iomuxc 29 130 1>,
<&iomuxc 30 129 1>, <&iomuxc 31 122 1>;
};
I don't think it makes sense to specify maxItems.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists