linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] opp: Reduce code duplication in _set_required

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200824122331.GA857@gerhold.net>
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 14:23:31 +0200
From:   Stephan Gerhold <stephan@...hold.net>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Niklas Cassel <nks@...wful.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] opp: Reduce code duplication in
 _set_required_opps()

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 05:40:04PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 24-08-20, 13:30, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > You're right. Not sure why I removed it.
> > 
> > I suspect I had it in _set_required_opp() at some point, but I moved
> > code around several times until I was happy with the result.
> > 
> > We should just add it back.
> > Should I send a v2 with it fixed or would you like to handle it?
> 
> I have applied the first two patches to linux-next branch in my tree,
> please have a look.
> 

Looks good to me. Thank you!

Stephan