linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix wrong cpu selecting from isolated domain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1598272219-43040-1-git-send-email-xlpang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 20:30:19 +0800
From:   Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
        Wetp Zhang <wetp.zy@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix wrong cpu selecting from isolated domain

We've met problems that occasionally tasks with full cpumask
(e.g. by putting it into a cpuset or setting to full affinity)
were migrated to our isolated cpus in production environment.

After some analysis, we found that it is due to the current
select_idle_smt() not considering the sched_domain mask.

Fix it by checking the valid domain mask in select_idle_smt().

Fixes: 10e2f1acd010 ("sched/core: Rewrite and improve select_idle_siblings())
Reported-by: Wetp Zhang <wetp.zy@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Xunlei Pang <xlpang@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 9 +++++----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 1a68a05..fa942c4 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6075,7 +6075,7 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int
 /*
  * Scan the local SMT mask for idle CPUs.
  */
-static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
+static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
 	int cpu;
 
@@ -6083,7 +6083,8 @@ static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
 		return -1;
 
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(target)) {
-		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr))
+		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr) ||
+		    !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
 			continue;
 		if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
 			return cpu;
@@ -6099,7 +6100,7 @@ static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *s
 	return -1;
 }
 
-static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
+static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
 {
 	return -1;
 }
@@ -6274,7 +6275,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 		return i;
 
-	i = select_idle_smt(p, target);
+	i = select_idle_smt(p, sd, target);
 	if ((unsigned)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 		return i;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1