linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 09/11] ima: Don't remove security.ima if file must not be appraised

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <681d6bd21410152c0488615b634f4b29140a3974.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:02:14 -0400
From:   Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>, mjg59@...gle.com
Cc:     linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/11] ima: Don't remove security.ima if file must not
 be appraised

On Thu, 2020-06-18 at 18:04 +0200, Roberto Sassu wrote:
> Files might come from a remote source and might have xattrs, including
> security.ima. It should not be IMA task to decide whether security.ima
> should be kept or not. This patch removes the removexattr() system
> call in ima_inode_post_setattr().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>

Yes, this has been previously discussed.

Reviewed-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>