[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e996ad05e434a6fb13f069ee72b876b@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:38:53 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Tang, Feng" <feng.tang@...el.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
CC: "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"lkp@...ts.01.org" <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...e.com>
Subject: RE: [LKP] Re: [x86/mce] 1de08dccd3: will-it-scale.per_process_ops
-14.1% regression
> Yes, that's what we suspected. And I just did another try to force the
> percpu mce structure aligned. And the regression seems to be gone (reduced
> from 14.1% to 2%), which further proved it.
I wonder whether it would be useful for bisection of performance issues
for you to change the global definition of DEFINE_PER_CPU() to make
all per CPU definitions aligned. Just like you switch compiler flags to make
all functions aligned.
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists