[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <418618c4-a0c6-6b28-6718-2726a29b83c5@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 11:13:54 -0700
From: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@...il.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
tusharsu@...ux.microsoft.com, sashal@...nel.org,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
SElinux list <selinux@...r.kernel.org>,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SELinux: Measure state and hash of policy using IMA
On 8/24/20 7:00 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
>> +int security_read_policy_kernel(struct selinux_state *state,
>> + void **data, size_t *len)
>> +{
>> + int rc;
>> +
>> + rc = security_read_policy_len(state, len);
>> + if (rc)
>> + return rc;
>> +
>> + *data = vmalloc(*len);
>> + if (!*data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>
>> + return security_read_selinux_policy(state, data, len);
>> }
>
> See the discussion here:
> https://lore.kernel.org/selinux/20200824113015.1375857-1-omosnace@redhat.com/T/#t
>
> In order for this to be safe, you need to ensure that all callers of
> security_read_policy_kernel() have taken fsi->mutex in selinuxfs and
> any use of security_read_policy_len() occurs while holding the mutex.
> Otherwise, the length can change between security_read_policy_len()
> and security_read_selinux_policy() if policy is reloaded.
>
"struct selinux_fs_info" is available when calling
security_read_policy_kernel() - currently in measure.c.
Only "struct selinux_state" is.
Is Ondrej's re-try approach I need to use to workaround policy reload issue?
thanks,
-lakshmi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists