linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.8 074/148] ext4: dont allow overlapping system zones

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:29:32 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 074/148] ext4: dont allow overlapping system zones

From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>

[ Upstream commit bf9a379d0980e7413d94cb18dac73db2bfc5f470 ]

Currently, add_system_zone() just silently merges two added system zones
that overlap. However the overlap should not happen and it generally
suggests that some unrelated metadata overlap which indicates the fs is
corrupted. We should have caught such problems earlier (e.g. in
ext4_check_descriptors()) but add this check as another line of defense.
In later patch we also use this for stricter checking of journal inode
extent tree.

Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200728130437.7804-3-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/ext4/block_validity.c | 36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
index 16e9b2fda03ae..b394a50ebbe30 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/block_validity.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int add_system_zone(struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks,
 			   ext4_fsblk_t start_blk,
 			   unsigned int count)
 {
-	struct ext4_system_zone *new_entry = NULL, *entry;
+	struct ext4_system_zone *new_entry, *entry;
 	struct rb_node **n = &system_blks->root.rb_node, *node;
 	struct rb_node *parent = NULL, *new_node = NULL;
 
@@ -79,30 +79,20 @@ static int add_system_zone(struct ext4_system_blocks *system_blks,
 			n = &(*n)->rb_left;
 		else if (start_blk >= (entry->start_blk + entry->count))
 			n = &(*n)->rb_right;
-		else {
-			if (start_blk + count > (entry->start_blk +
-						 entry->count))
-				entry->count = (start_blk + count -
-						entry->start_blk);
-			new_node = *n;
-			new_entry = rb_entry(new_node, struct ext4_system_zone,
-					     node);
-			break;
-		}
+		else	/* Unexpected overlap of system zones. */
+			return -EFSCORRUPTED;
 	}
 
-	if (!new_entry) {
-		new_entry = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_system_zone_cachep,
-					     GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!new_entry)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-		new_entry->start_blk = start_blk;
-		new_entry->count = count;
-		new_node = &new_entry->node;
-
-		rb_link_node(new_node, parent, n);
-		rb_insert_color(new_node, &system_blks->root);
-	}
+	new_entry = kmem_cache_alloc(ext4_system_zone_cachep,
+				     GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!new_entry)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	new_entry->start_blk = start_blk;
+	new_entry->count = count;
+	new_node = &new_entry->node;
+
+	rb_link_node(new_node, parent, n);
+	rb_insert_color(new_node, &system_blks->root);
 
 	/* Can we merge to the left? */
 	node = rb_prev(new_node);
-- 
2.25.1