linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.8 137/232] USB: serial: ftdi

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200824085905.GA405532@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 10:59:05 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.8 137/232] USB: serial: ftdi_sio: fix break and sysrq
 handling

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 10:54:24AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:56:52AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 11:51:56AM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > > This was never intended for stable as it is not a critical fix and has
> > > never worked properly in the first place. Please drop this one and the
> > > preparatory clean ups from all stable trees.
> > 
> > Ok, but the "fix this thing" and the "Fixes:" tag really did imply this
> > was actually fixing something :)
> 
> Sure and it is indeed a fix, just not for a regression or something
> critical (oops, etc), and therefore the stable-cc tag was omitted.
> 
> > I'll drop it from everywhere, thanks.
> 
> Looks like you never dropped the preparatory clean ups. Should be ok.

Ah, sorry about that, shouldn't be a problem :)