lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 06:59:05 +0200 From: Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com> To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Cc: x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>, Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>, Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>, Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>, Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> Subject: Re: [patch RFC 24/38] x86/xen: Consolidate XEN-MSI init On 21.08.20 02:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > X86 cannot store the irq domain pointer in struct device without breaking > XEN because the irq domain pointer takes precedence over arch_*_msi_irqs() > fallbacks. > > To achieve this XEN MSI interrupt management needs to be wrapped into an > irq domain. > > Move the x86_msi ops setup into a single function to prepare for this. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de> > --- > arch/x86/pci/xen.c | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) > > --- a/arch/x86/pci/xen.c > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/xen.c > @@ -371,7 +371,10 @@ static void xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs > WARN(ret && ret != -ENOSYS, "restore_msi -> %d\n", ret); > } > } > -#endif > +#else /* CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 */ > +#define xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs NULL > +#define xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs NULL > +#endif /* !CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 */ > > static void xen_teardown_msi_irqs(struct pci_dev *dev) > { > @@ -403,7 +406,31 @@ static void xen_teardown_msi_irq(unsigne > WARN_ON_ONCE(1); > } > > -#endif > +static __init void xen_setup_pci_msi(void) > +{ > + if (xen_initial_domain()) { > + x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs; > + x86_msi.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs; > + x86_msi.restore_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs; > + pci_msi_ignore_mask = 1; This is wrong, as a PVH initial domain shouldn't do the pv settings. The "if (xen_initial_domain())" should be inside the pv case, like: if (xen_pv_domain()) { if (xen_initial_domain()) { ... } else { ... } } else if (xen_hvm_domain()) { ... Juergen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists