[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200825154400.GC28468@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 17:44:01 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
christian.brauner@...ntu.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de, esyr@...hat.com,
christian@...lner.me, areber@...hat.com, shakeelb@...gle.com,
cyphar@...har.com, adobriyan@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, gladkov.alexey@...il.com, walken@...gle.com,
daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com, avagin@...il.com,
bernd.edlinger@...mail.de, john.johansen@...onical.com,
laoar.shao@...il.com, timmurray@...gle.com, minchan@...nel.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] mm, oom_adj: don't loop through tasks in
__set_oom_adj when not necessary
On 08/25, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
> Btw. now that the flag is in place we can optimize __oom_kill_process as
> well.
and zap_threads().
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists