[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b19bc982-a0c4-c6ff-d8f5-650f2b3a83c8@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:40:27 -0700
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS FOR ALLWINNER A10"
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"open list:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Julien Grall <julien.grall@....com>,
"open list:ACPI FOR ARM64 (ACPI/arm64)" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM PORT" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ALLWINNER A10 CSI DRIVER" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEM"
<linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:SUPERH" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:USB SUBSYSTEM" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 00/11] PCI: brcmstb: enable PCIe for STB chips
Hi,
On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
>
> Patchset Summary:
> Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design
> we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role
> allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info.
We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there
is any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for
the 5.10 merge window.
There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the
ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion?
Thanks!
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists