lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 20:19:54 +0200 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: Qiwu Huang <yanziily@...il.com>, Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Qiwu Huang <huangqiwu@...omi.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] power: supply: core: add quick charge type property Hi! > > > > If we ported the full driver, we would break the existing driver > > > > structure because we would introduce more Qualcomm code. I think > > > > that's an unreasonable change. > > > > > > That doesn't make much sense. You have a working driver for these apis, > > > just submit it for inclusion, it should never break any existing > > > drivers, otherwise your code wouldn't work either. > > > > We're an Android device, we're working on a Qualcomm based code, and > > from the current code tree, the current code tree is missing the QTI > > Charger code > > I don't know what that means, sorry. Just submit your driver, and any > needed dependencies as well. There's no other way to evaluate this api > addition without that, right? Actually, there's a way to evaluate the API without the driver... if the API is pretty obviously unacceptable. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists