linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200825165634.46a90fac@lwn.net>
Date:   Tue, 25 Aug 2020 16:56:34 -0600
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
        "Alexander A. Klimov" <grandmaster@...klimov.de>,
        clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add minimum clang/llvm version

On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:51:31 -0700
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:

> > +Clang/LLVM (optional)  10.0.1           clang --version  
> 
> Maybe it is worth making the "(optional)" a footnote like Sphinx? Seems
> to just kind of stick out to me but I do not have a strong opinion
> unless others do.

Let's not do that; the table needs to be properly readable in plain-text
format.  Adding that sort of markup will just serve to obfuscate things.

Thanks,

jon