[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200825022219.GW1236603@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:22:19 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] bio: Direct IO: convert to pin_user_pages_fast()
On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 07:07:02PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 8/24/20 6:54 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 09:20:54PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
> >
> > > Direct IO behavior:
> > >
> > > ITER_IOVEC:
> > > pin_user_pages_fast();
> > > break;
> > >
> > > ITER_KVEC: // already elevated page refcount, leave alone
> > > ITER_BVEC: // already elevated page refcount, leave alone
> > > ITER_PIPE: // just, no :)
> >
> > Why? What's wrong with splice to O_DIRECT file?
> >
>
> Oh! I'll take a look. Is this the fs/splice.c stuff? I ruled this out early
> mainly based on Christoph's comment in [1] ("ITER_PIPE is rejected іn the
> direct I/O path"), but if it's supportable then I'll hook it up.
; cat >a.c <<'EOF'
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
int main()
{
int fd = open("./a.out", O_DIRECT);
splice(fd, NULL, 1, NULL, 4096, 0);
return 0;
}
EOF
; cc a.c
; ./a.out | wc -c
4096
and you just had ->read_iter() called with ITER_PIPE destination.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists