lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Aug 2020 06:21:02 +0200
From:   Jürgen Groß <jgross@...e.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
        Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
        Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
        Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Megha Dey <megha.dey@...el.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 24/38] x86/xen: Consolidate XEN-MSI init

On 24.08.20 23:21, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24 2020 at 06:59, Jürgen Groß wrote:
>> On 21.08.20 02:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> +static __init void xen_setup_pci_msi(void)
>>> +{
>>> +	if (xen_initial_domain()) {
>>> +		x86_msi.setup_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_setup_msi_irqs;
>>> +		x86_msi.teardown_msi_irqs = xen_teardown_msi_irqs;
>>> +		x86_msi.restore_msi_irqs = xen_initdom_restore_msi_irqs;
>>> +		pci_msi_ignore_mask = 1;
>>
>> This is wrong, as a PVH initial domain shouldn't do the pv settings.
>>
>> The "if (xen_initial_domain())" should be inside the pv case, like:
>>
>> if (xen_pv_domain()) {
>> 	if (xen_initial_domain()) {
>> 		...
>> 	} else {
>> 		...
>> 	}
>> } else if (xen_hvm_domain()) {
>> 	...
> 
> I still think it does the right thing depending on the place it is
> called from, but even if so, it's completely unreadable gunk. I'll fix
> that proper.

The main issue is that xen_initial_domain() and xen_pv_domain() are
orthogonal to each other. So xen_initial_domain() can either be true
for xen_pv_domain() (the "classic" pv dom0) or for xen_hvm_domain()
(the new PVH dom0).


Juergen

Powered by blists - more mailing lists