[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200825085828.399505-11-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:58:27 +0200
From: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jérôme Pouiller
<jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/12] staging: wfx: remove useless extra jiffy
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
The initial developer has feared msecs_to_jiffies() could round down the
result. However, the documentation of msecs_to_jiffies() says that the
result is rounded upward. So the increment of the result of
msecs_to_jiffies() is not necessary.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
index 53ae0b5abcdd..07304a80c29b 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/bh.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static void device_wakeup(struct wfx_dev *wdev)
// wait_for_completion_done_timeout()). So we have to emulate
// it.
if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready,
- msecs_to_jiffies(2) + 1))
+ msecs_to_jiffies(2)))
complete(&wdev->hif.ctrl_ready);
else
dev_err(wdev->dev, "timeout while wake up chip\n");
--
2.28.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists