[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87pn7f9jeq.fsf@oldenburg2.str.redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:14:37 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list\:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 9/9] x86: Disallow vsyscall emulation when CET is enabled
* Andy Lutomirski:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 5:30 PM Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
>>
>> Emulation of the legacy vsyscall page is required by some programs built
>> before 2013. Newer programs after 2013 don't use it. Disallow vsyscall
>> emulation when Control-flow Enforcement (CET) is enabled to enhance
>> security.
>
> NAK.
>
> By all means disable execute emulation if CET-IBT is enabled at the
> time emulation is attempted, and maybe even disable the vsyscall page
> entirely if you can magically tell that CET-IBT will be enabled when a
> process starts, but you don't get to just disable it outright on a
> CET-enabled kernel.
Yeah, we definitely would have to revert/avoid this downstream. People
definitely want to run glibc-2.12-era workloads on current kernels.
Thanks for catching it.
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists