lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Aug 2020 03:12:49 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To:     Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, maz@...nel.org,
        mka@...omium.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        jason@...edaemon.net, dianders@...omium.org, rnayak@...eaurora.org,
        ilina@...eaurora.org, lsrao@...eaurora.org,
        Maulik Shah <mkshah@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] genirq/PM: Introduce IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND flag

Quoting Maulik Shah (2020-08-22 09:16:58)
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/pm.c b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> index c6c7e18..2cc800b 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/pm.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/pm.c
> @@ -69,12 +69,17 @@ void irq_pm_remove_action(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
>  
>  static bool suspend_device_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>  {
> +       unsigned long chipflags = irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags;
> +
>         if (!desc->action || irq_desc_is_chained(desc) ||
>             desc->no_suspend_depth)
>                 return false;
>  
>         if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
>                 irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_WAKEUP_ARMED);
> +
> +               if (chipflags & IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND)
> +                       irq_enable(desc);

Where is the corresponding change to resume_irq()? Don't we need to
disable an irq if it was disabled on suspend and forcibly enabled here?

>                 /*
>                  * We return true here to force the caller to issue
>                  * synchronize_irq(). We need to make sure that the
> @@ -93,7 +98,7 @@ static bool suspend_device_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
>          * chip level. The chip implementation indicates that with
>          * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND.
>          */
> -       if (irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND)
> +       if (chipflags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND)
>                 mask_irq(desc);
>         return true;
>  }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists