[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d81c567970db5aefcc59d6f967c82f17@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 11:23:25 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@...anix.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
raphael.s.norwitz@...il.com, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix typo in irq_domain documentation
On 2020-08-19 22:53, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> The irq_domain documentation states that "Here the interrupt number
> loose all kind of correspondence to hardware interrupt numbers:...".
> It's clear from the context that the author means to use "loses"
> instead
> of "loose". To avoid future confusion, this change fixes the
> aforementioned wording.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@...anix.com>
> ---
> Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> index 096db12..eba5e41 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/irq/irq-domain.rst
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ such as GPIO controllers avoid reimplementing
> identical callback
> mechanisms as the IRQ core system by modelling their interrupt
> handlers as irqchips, i.e. in effect cascading interrupt controllers.
>
> -Here the interrupt number loose all kind of correspondence to
> +Here the interrupt number loses all kind of correspondence to
> hardware interrupt numbers: whereas in the past, IRQ numbers could
> be chosen so they matched the hardware IRQ line into the root
> interrupt controller (i.e. the component actually fireing the
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists