[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <874kor57jm.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 12:44:29 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Chang Seok Bae <chang.seok.bae@...el.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/entry/64: Do not use RDPID in paranoid entry to accomodate KVM
On Fri, Aug 21 2020 at 11:35, Brian Gerst wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 10:22 AM Sean Christopherson
>> > .macro GET_PERCPU_BASE reg:req
>> > - ALTERNATIVE \
>> > - "LOAD_CPU_AND_NODE_SEG_LIMIT \reg", \
>> > - "RDPID \reg", \
>>
>> This was the only user of the RDPID macro, I assume we want to yank that out
>> as well?
>
> No. That one should be kept until the minimum binutils version is
> raised to one that supports the RDPID opcode.
The macro is unused and nothing in the kernel can use RDPID as we just
established.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists