lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 17:43:43 -0700 From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com> To: Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com> CC: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>, Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Andrey Ignatov <rdna@...com>, Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@...udflare.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf: Introduce pseudo_btf_id On 8/24/20 5:05 PM, Hao Luo wrote: > Yonghong, > > An update on this thread. I successfully reproduced this issue on a > 8.2.0 gcc compiler, It looks like gcc 4.9 did not have this issue. I > was also using clang which did not show this bug. > > It seems having a DW_AT_specification that refers to another > DW_TAG_variable isn't handled in pahole. I have a (maybe hacky) pahole > patch as fix and let me clean it up and post for review soon. Sounds good. Thanks for fixing it in pahole! People may use gcc 4.9 up to gcc 10, or llvm compiler (let us say llvm10 which is the version which has CO-RE support and is recommended for compiling bpf programs.) Once you have fix for gcc 8.2, it might be worthwhile to check a few other gcc/llvm version (at least gcc8/9/10 and llvm10) to ensure it still works. Currently, by default kernel is using DWARF2, pahole has a good support for dwarf2. I am not sure whether it supports dwarf4 well or not. But I think additional dwarf4 support, if needed, can be done a little bit later as dwarf4 is not widely used yet for kernel, I think. > > Hao >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists