lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 14:53:20 +0100 From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> Cc: Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@...il.com>, Frank Lee <frank@...winnertech.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, gregory.clement@...tlin.com, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jason@...edaemon.net, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, Srini Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, Vasily Khoruzhick <anarsoul@...il.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>, "p.zabel" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>, Ondřej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>, clabbe@...libre.com, bage@...utronix.de, devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Allwinner A100 Initial support On Tue, 25 Aug 2020, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:03:27AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2020, Frank Lee wrote: > > > > > ping...... > > > > "Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable > > time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences > > and so on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical > > bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If > > there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those > > to be addressed. Sending content free pings just adds to the mail > > volume (if they are seen at all) and if something has gone wrong > > you'll have to resend the patches anyway so [RESEND]ing with any > > comments addressed is generally a much better approach." > > This is true to some extent, but pinging after a month doesn't seem > unreasonable either. Pinging is mostly a fruitless exercise. After a month, many Maintainers would have purged any un-serviced mails anyway. If a patch-set is left hanging, still requiring attention before the next version, submitting a [RESEND] is generally a better option. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists