lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 25 Aug 2020 01:03:25 +0000
From:   "Mani, Rajmohan" <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>
To:     Prashant Malani <pmalani@...omium.org>
CC:     Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Ayman Bagabas <ayman.bagabas@...il.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        "Joseph, Jithu" <jithu.joseph@...el.com>,
        Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@...n.io>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org" 
        <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bleung@...omium.org" <bleung@...omium.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/3] platform/x86: Add Intel Input Output Manager (IOM)
 driver

Hi Prashant,

...

> > > > +
> > > > +	reg = iom->regbar + IOM_PORT_STATUS_OFFSET + IOM_REG_LEN *
> > > port;
> > > > +
> > > > +	*status = ioread32(reg);
> > >
> > > Perhaps just inline reg within the parentheses?
> >
> > Kept this way to increase readability. Let me know if you feel
> > strongly towards inline reg.
> 
> I'd rather this be inlined, you save a couple lines from the variable declaration,
> and IMO we're not gaining much in terms of readability by declaring this
> separately.
> 

Ack
(at least to me, it was more readable)

...

> >
> > > > +
> > > > +	return 0;
> > > > +}
> > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(intel_iom_port_status);
> > > > +
> > > > +static int intel_iom_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > > > +	void __iomem *addr;
> > > > +
> > > > +	/* only one IOM device is supported */
> > >
> > > Minor nit: s/only/Only
> >
> > And then I may need to end the comment with a period.
> > Let me know if you feel strongly.
> Yes, let's capitalize and add the period. Let's try to use the right punctuation
> where possible.
> 

Ack
Will take care of this as part of v3.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists