[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200825145652.GA780995@rani.riverdale.lan>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2020 10:56:52 -0400
From: Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
e5ten.arch@...il.com,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/boot/compressed: Disable relocation relaxation
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 01:56:49PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
> I saw you picked up Arvind's other series into x86/boot. Would you
> mind please including this, as well? Our CI is quite red for x86...
>
> EOM
>
Hi Ingo, while this patch is unnecessary after the series in
tip/x86/boot, it is still needed for 5.9 and older. Would you be able to
send it in for the next -rc? It shouldn't hurt the tip/x86/boot series,
and we can add a revert on top of that later.
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists