linux-kernel - Re: Issue with iwd + Linux 5.8.3 + WPA Enterprise

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMj1kXEn507bEt+eT6q7MpCwNH=oAZsTkFRz0t=kPEV0QxFsOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Aug 2020 17:42:27 +0200
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
To:     Denis Kenzior <denkenz@...il.com>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Andrew Zaborowski <andrew.zaborowski@...el.com>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
        Caleb Jorden <caljorden@...mail.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, iwd@...ts.01.org,
        "# 3.4.x" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Issue with iwd + Linux 5.8.3 + WPA Enterprise

On Wed, 26 Aug 2020 at 17:33, Denis Kenzior <denkenz@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Herbert,
>
> On 8/26/20 9:19 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 08:57:17AM -0500, Denis Kenzior wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm just waking up now, so I might seem dense, but for my education, can you
> >> tell me why we need to set MSG_MORE when we issue just a single sendmsg
> >> followed immediately by recv/recvmsg? ell/iwd operates on small buffers, so
> >> we don't really feed the kernel data in multiple send operations.  You can
> >> see this in the ell git tree link referenced in Andrew's reply.
> >
> > You obviously don't need MSG_MORE if you're doing a single sendmsg.
> >
> > The problematic code is in l_cipher_set_iv.  It does a sendmsg(2)
> > that expects to be followed by more sendmsg(2) calls before a
> > recvmsg(2).  That's the one that needs a MSG_MORE.
> >
>
> Gotcha.  I fixed the set_iv part now in ell:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/libs/ell/ell.git/commit/?id=87c76bbc85fe286925cbdb53d733fc9f9fd2ed12
>

Interestingly, that change alone (without the kernel side fix that
Herbert just provided) is not sufficient to make the self tests work
again.

I still get a failure in aes_siv_encrypt(), which does not occur with
the kernel side fix applied.