[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VepkugjZ4pvdNgxzT4T83ewL1AFtSZZtVq6aL+7=sqskA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 18:53:02 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Brooke Basile <brookebasile@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
USB <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
Ilja Van Sprundel <ivansprundel@...ctive.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] USB fixes for 5.9-rc3
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 6:36 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 05:02:38PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> > On 26.08.2020 15:43, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Brooke Basile (2):
> > > USB: gadget: u_f: add overflow checks to VLA macros
> >
> > Sorry, but the above patch breaks USB Ethernet Gadget operation. It also
> > didn't get the proper testing in linux-next (next-20200826 is the first
> > one with this patch).
> >
> > This is how it explodes on Samsung Exynos (ARM 32bit) based board with
> > g_ether module loaded:
> Odd, for a "normal" descriptor, the logic should have remained the same
> as without this patch.
> Brooke, any ideas?
I have an idea.
Does below fix this?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
View attachment "1.diff" of type "text/x-patch" (1099 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists